Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ScrewedByTheLawyers

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Due to Creator/{{Universal}}'s exclusive licensing contract with Creator/MarvelComics a decade before Creator/{{Disney}}'s acquisition of Marvel, Disney is severely limited in the Marvel-themed attractions they can build at [[Ride/DisneyThemeParks their parks]] in [[Ride/WaltDisneyWorld Orlando]] and Japan, as [[Ride/UniversalStudios Universal's theme parks]] in both areas have built Marvel theming first. Disney is only able to use the characters Universal didn't use such as Film/{{Doctor Strange|2016}} and the Film/{{Guardians of the Galaxy|2014}}. This is why when Disney built a new ''Ride/AvengersCAMPUS'' area (''Stark Expo'' in Hong Kong) for their theme parks in the early 2020s, the Orlando and Japan parks were left out of the mix. Even in [[Ride/{{Disneyland}} Anaheim]], the word "Marvel" cannot actually be used anywhere in the parks as the contract also prevents Disney from using the "Marvel" name ''anywhere'' in their parks in the United States (especially east of the Mississippi River) and Japan. The nearest Disney can do, at least for the Japan parks, was just have a few select Marvel heroes being shown in some of the shows and nothing more, starting in 2024.

to:

* Due to Creator/{{Universal}}'s exclusive licensing contract with Creator/MarvelComics a decade before Creator/{{Disney}}'s acquisition of Marvel, Disney is severely limited in the Marvel-themed attractions they can build at [[Ride/DisneyThemeParks their parks]] in [[Ride/WaltDisneyWorld Orlando]] and Japan, as [[Ride/UniversalStudios Universal's theme parks]] in both areas have built Marvel theming first. Disney is only able to use the characters Universal didn't use such as Film/{{Doctor Strange|2016}} and the Film/{{Guardians of the Galaxy|2014}}. This is why when Disney built a new ''Ride/AvengersCAMPUS'' area (''Stark Expo'' in Hong Kong) for their theme parks in the early 2020s, the Orlando and Japan parks were left out of the mix. Even in [[Ride/{{Disneyland}} Anaheim]], the word "Marvel" cannot actually be used anywhere in the parks as the contract also prevents Disney from using the "Marvel" name ''anywhere'' in their parks in the United States (especially east of the Mississippi River) and Japan. The nearest Disney can do, at least for the Japan parks, was is to just have a few select Marvel heroes being shown in some of the shows and nothing more, starting in 2024.2024, including a six-month limited time ''Guardians Of The Galaxy'' retheme of Tokyo's ''Ride/ItsASmallWorld'', ''It's a Small World with Groot'' for Winter 2025, which also induces other Marvel heroes that were not allowed to show up there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Due to Creator/{{Universal}}'s exclusive licensing contract with Creator/MarvelComics a decade before Creator/{{Disney}}'s acquisition of Marvel, Disney is severely limited in the Marvel-themed attractions they can build at [[Ride/DisneyThemeParks their parks]] in [[Ride/WaltDisneyWorld Orlando]] and Japan, as [[Ride/UniversalStudios Universal's theme parks]] in both areas have built Marvel theming first. Disney is only able to use the characters Universal didn't use such as Film/{{Doctor Strange|2016}} and the Film/{{Guardians of the Galaxy|2014}}. This is why when Disney built a new ''Ride/AvengersCAMPUS'' area (''Stark Expo'' in Hong Kong) for their theme parks in the early 2020s, the Orlando and Japan parks were left out of the mix. Even in [[Ride/{{Disneyland}} Anaheim]], the word "Marvel" cannot actually be used anywhere in the parks as the contract also prevents Disney from using the "Marvel" name ''anywhere'' in their parks in the United States (especially east of the Mississippi River) and Japan.

to:

* Due to Creator/{{Universal}}'s exclusive licensing contract with Creator/MarvelComics a decade before Creator/{{Disney}}'s acquisition of Marvel, Disney is severely limited in the Marvel-themed attractions they can build at [[Ride/DisneyThemeParks their parks]] in [[Ride/WaltDisneyWorld Orlando]] and Japan, as [[Ride/UniversalStudios Universal's theme parks]] in both areas have built Marvel theming first. Disney is only able to use the characters Universal didn't use such as Film/{{Doctor Strange|2016}} and the Film/{{Guardians of the Galaxy|2014}}. This is why when Disney built a new ''Ride/AvengersCAMPUS'' area (''Stark Expo'' in Hong Kong) for their theme parks in the early 2020s, the Orlando and Japan parks were left out of the mix. Even in [[Ride/{{Disneyland}} Anaheim]], the word "Marvel" cannot actually be used anywhere in the parks as the contract also prevents Disney from using the "Marvel" name ''anywhere'' in their parks in the United States (especially east of the Mississippi River) and Japan. The nearest Disney can do, at least for the Japan parks, was just have a few select Marvel heroes being shown in some of the shows and nothing more, starting in 2024.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Manhua]]
* ''Manhua/DigimonLegendarySkies'' was ultimately cancelled due to copywrite issues regarding it's use of ''Anime/DigimonFrontier'' characters, as it had original been developed as a sequel to ''Frontier''.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on work content


* As can be read [[http://rosalarian.tumblr.com/post/65353128180/its-with-extreme-sadness-that-i-announce-that-my here]], this trope is why ''Webcomic/IWasKidnappedByLesbianPiratesFromOuterSpace'' is no longer available online. Because Platinum Studios brought the rights to [=LPFOS=] in 2006 and that it's a successful webcomic under Platinum's brand, they couldn't host/draw the comic on their own anymore.

to:

* As can be read [[http://rosalarian.[[https://web.archive.org/web/20131112041800/http://rosalarian.tumblr.com/post/65353128180/its-with-extreme-sadness-that-i-announce-that-my here]], here]] (via archive), this trope is why ''Webcomic/IWasKidnappedByLesbianPiratesFromOuterSpace'' is no longer available online. Because Platinum Studios brought the rights to [=LPFOS=] the comic in 2006 and that 2006; since it's a successful webcomic under Platinum's brand, they the author Ro Salarian couldn't host/draw the comic on their own anymore.anymore. They have since released part of it for free on their website.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''You've Been Trumped'' and its sequel ''You've Been Trumped Too'' are documentaries by British filmmaker Anthony Baxter describing the controversy surrounding the construction of a golf resort in on a beach in northern Scotland by real estate developer-turned-US President UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump, and the legal fights between Trump and the locals who opposed the golf course's construction. In both cases, Trump unsuccessfully strongarmed BBC and the filmmaker into not screening the films with legal threats and [[FrivolousLawsuit frivolous lawsuits]].

to:

* ''You've Been Trumped'' and its sequel ''You've Been Trumped Too'' are documentaries by British filmmaker Anthony Baxter describing the controversy surrounding the construction of a golf resort in on a beach in northern Scotland by real estate developer-turned-US President UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump, and the legal fights between Trump and the locals who opposed the golf course's construction. In both cases, Trump unsuccessfully strongarmed BBC and the filmmaker into not screening the films with legal threats and [[FrivolousLawsuit frivolous lawsuits]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fixed missing close argument for Literature folder



to:

[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Documentaries]]
* ''You've Been Trumped'' and its sequel ''You've Been Trumped Too'' are documentaries by British filmmaker Anthony Baxter describing the controversy surrounding the construction of a golf resort in on a beach in northern Scotland by real estate developer-turned-US President UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump, and the legal fights between Trump and the locals who opposed the golf course's construction. In both cases, Trump unsuccessfully strongarmed BBC and the filmmaker into not screening the films with legal threats and [[FrivolousLawsuit frivolous lawsuits]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


UsefulNotes/{{Copyright}} and UsefulNotes/{{Trademark}} law have gotten in the way of or forced cancellation for many works. No matter how [[AddedAlliterativeAppeal promising, popular or profitable]] a show is, it's still apt to get canceled if it would be ''illegal'' to keep broadcasting.

to:

UsefulNotes/{{Copyright}} MediaNotes/{{Copyright}} and UsefulNotes/{{Trademark}} MediaNotes/{{Trademark}} law have gotten in the way of or forced cancellation for many works. No matter how [[AddedAlliterativeAppeal promising, popular or profitable]] a show is, it's still apt to get canceled if it would be ''illegal'' to keep broadcasting.



* Toys/{{Lego}} ''Toys/{{Bionicle}}'' took certain character names and concepts from various Polynesian cultures, mainly Maori. However, [[CommonKnowledge contrary to a widespread belief]] they did not try to trademark them. The closest they got to that was with the UsefulNotes/GameBoyAdvance game ''Tales of the Tohunga'' -- unknown to LEGO at the time, the word Tohunga (usually defined as "expert" or "craftsman") carried a very culturally sensitive historical meaning (ostracized traditional healers and medical practitioners). Due to threats of legal action from Maori tribal groups, LEGO changed tack, replaced Tohunga with the made-up word Matoran, changed the game's title to ''Quest for the Toa'' and [[MyNaymeIs altered the spelling of many other names]]. With this they managed to avoid a lawsuit, but going forward, LEGO would instate their own legal procedure for creating ''BIONICLE'' names: each name was given an elaborate legal check that reportedly cost a whopping $10,000 per word. This ensured that they would not accidentally use words that had inconvenient double meanings in other languages. As well, nearly all Polynesian-influenced concepts like the deities Papu and Rangi (based on Papatūānuku and Ranginui) or the ritualistic Haka dances were wiped from canon before they were even introduced in media, and the entire ''BIONICLE'' franchise was reorganized behind the scenes to remove its spiritual or mystical elements.

to:

* Toys/{{Lego}} ''Toys/{{Bionicle}}'' took certain character names and concepts from various Polynesian cultures, mainly Maori. However, [[CommonKnowledge contrary to a widespread belief]] they did not try to trademark them. The closest they got to that was with the UsefulNotes/GameBoyAdvance Platform/GameBoyAdvance game ''Tales of the Tohunga'' -- unknown to LEGO at the time, the word Tohunga (usually defined as "expert" or "craftsman") carried a very culturally sensitive historical meaning (ostracized traditional healers and medical practitioners). Due to threats of legal action from Maori tribal groups, LEGO changed tack, replaced Tohunga with the made-up word Matoran, changed the game's title to ''Quest for the Toa'' and [[MyNaymeIs altered the spelling of many other names]]. With this they managed to avoid a lawsuit, but going forward, LEGO would instate their own legal procedure for creating ''BIONICLE'' names: each name was given an elaborate legal check that reportedly cost a whopping $10,000 per word. This ensured that they would not accidentally use words that had inconvenient double meanings in other languages. As well, nearly all Polynesian-influenced concepts like the deities Papu and Rangi (based on Papatūānuku and Ranginui) or the ritualistic Haka dances were wiped from canon before they were even introduced in media, and the entire ''BIONICLE'' franchise was reorganized behind the scenes to remove its spiritual or mystical elements.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* About the UsefulNotes/{{Ital|y}}ian [[UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance Renaissance]] set of painting of the ''Art/SevenVirtues'' (1470), the reason Creator/SandroBotticelli painted only one, ''Fortitude'', is because Piero del Pollaiolo wrestled the commission from him in his favor after contesting the choice of artist by the Tribunale di Mercanzia (the legal body that regulated craftsmanship guilds in UsefulNotes/TheCityStateEra, arts included) of UsefulNotes/{{Florence}}. Pollaiolo then painted the six others.

to:

* About the UsefulNotes/{{Ital|y}}ian [[UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance Renaissance]] set of painting of the ''Art/SevenVirtues'' (1470), the reason Creator/SandroBotticelli painted only one, ''Fortitude'', is because Piero del Pollaiolo wrestled the commission from him in his favor after contesting the choice of artist by the Tribunale di Mercanzia (the legal body that regulated merchant disputes and craftsmanship guilds in UsefulNotes/TheCityStateEra, arts included) of UsefulNotes/{{Florence}}. Pollaiolo then painted the six others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* About the UsefulNotes/{{Ital|y}}ian [[UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance Renaissance]] set of painting of the ''Art/SevenVirtues'' (1470), the reason Creator/SandroBotticelli painted only one, ''Fortitude'', is because Piero del Pollaiolo wrestled the commission from him in his favor after contesting the choice of artist by the Tribunale di Mercanzia (the regulating organ of guilds in UsefulNotes/TheCityStateEra, arts included) of UsefulNotes/{{Florence}}. Pollaiolo then painted the six others.

to:

* About the UsefulNotes/{{Ital|y}}ian [[UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance Renaissance]] set of painting of the ''Art/SevenVirtues'' (1470), the reason Creator/SandroBotticelli painted only one, ''Fortitude'', is because Piero del Pollaiolo wrestled the commission from him in his favor after contesting the choice of artist by the Tribunale di Mercanzia (the regulating organ of legal body that regulated craftsmanship guilds in UsefulNotes/TheCityStateEra, arts included) of UsefulNotes/{{Florence}}. Pollaiolo then painted the six others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* About the UsefulNotes/{{Ital|y}}ian [[UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance Renaissance]] set of painting of the ''Art/SevenVirtues'' (1470), the reason Creator/SandroBotticelli painted only one, ''Fortitude'', is because Piero del Pollaiolo wrestled the commission from him in his favor after contesting the choice of artist by the Tribunale di Mercanzia of UsefulNotes/{{Florence}}. Pollaiolo then painted the six others.

to:

* About the UsefulNotes/{{Ital|y}}ian [[UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance Renaissance]] set of painting of the ''Art/SevenVirtues'' (1470), the reason Creator/SandroBotticelli painted only one, ''Fortitude'', is because Piero del Pollaiolo wrestled the commission from him in his favor after contesting the choice of artist by the Tribunale di Mercanzia (the regulating organ of guilds in UsefulNotes/TheCityStateEra, arts included) of UsefulNotes/{{Florence}}. Pollaiolo then painted the six others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Art]]
* About the UsefulNotes/{{Ital|y}}ian [[UsefulNotes/TheRenaissance Renaissance]] set of painting of the ''Art/SevenVirtues'' (1470), the reason Creator/SandroBotticelli painted only one, ''Fortitude'', is because Piero del Pollaiolo wrestled the commission from him in his favor after contesting the choice of artist by the Tribunale di Mercanzia of UsefulNotes/{{Florence}}. Pollaiolo then painted the six others.
[[/folder]]

Top