Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / Damsel

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EsotericHappyEnding: Elodie has defeated the kingdom that is sacrificing women to a dragon. However, it seems her own kingdom, especially with their king [[spoiler:dead]], will still be suffering from an apocalyptically harsh winter and famine. Elodie's wedding and [[spoiler:sacrifice]] was a bargain struck to avert such disaster, only for the king to attempt to back out at the last minute. [[spoiler:Aurea is also in total chaos, with the extermination of its entire ruling royal family. Real world history teaches us that is not a recipe for stability.]]

to:

* EsotericHappyEnding: Elodie has defeated the kingdom that is sacrificing women to a dragon. However, it seems her own kingdom, especially with their king [[spoiler:dead]], land will still be suffering from an apocalyptically harsh winter and famine. Elodie's wedding and [[spoiler:sacrifice]] was a bargain struck to avert such disaster, only for the king her father to attempt to back out at the last minute. [[spoiler:Aurea is also in total chaos, with the extermination of its entire ruling royal family. Real world history teaches us that is not a recipe for stability.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OlderThanTheyThink: It's been noted that the movie bears some similarities to the 1981 film ''Film/{{Dragonslayer}}''; both are darker and more subversive takes on the classic "knight rescues princess from dragon" plot, both feature corrupt kingdoms that sacrifice women to a dragon in exchange for protection - including rigging things to protect the upper-classes at the expense of lower-class women - and both have the dragon seek bloody vengeance after [[spoiler:her three children are killed]] (albeit this occurs at different points in each film's plot).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* ItsTheSameNowItSucks: When the teasers were released, people seemed to be rather annoyed at the fact that it ''yet another'' FracturedFairyTale movie [[DamselOutOfDistress subverting the]] DamselInDistress trope, which has been done to death in the past decade, which never banished when the film proper released, as it didn't really do anything new with the trope that other films have already done and, in many people's eyes, much better.

to:

* ItsTheSameNowItSucks: When the teasers were released, some people seemed were [[TaintedByThePreview annoyed]] that the film appeared to be rather annoyed at the fact that it ''yet another'' FracturedFairyTale movie [[DamselOutOfDistress subverting the]] DamselInDistress trope, which has been done to death in the past decade, which never banished decade. This didn't lessen much when the film proper was released, as it didn't really do anything new with the trope these fantasy tropes that other films and books have already done and, in many people's eyes, much better.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I'm surprised no one has added this yet

Added DiffLines:

* ItsTheSameNowItSucks: When the teasers were released, people seemed to be rather annoyed at the fact that it ''yet another'' FracturedFairyTale movie [[DamselOutOfDistress subverting the]] DamselInDistress trope, which has been done to death in the past decade, which never banished when the film proper released, as it didn't really do anything new with the trope that other films have already done and, in many people's eyes, much better.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: The Dragon is clearly intended to be seen as a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds with the sacrifices [[spoiler:being payment for the unprovoked murder of her children.]] The problem being she's a sadistic SerialKiller who's been taking her rage out on fully innocent girls for ''centuries'' without a flicker of remorse and only minds that she [[spoiler:didn't kill the 'right' girls]]. She gleefully tortures and butchers utterly helpless people [[spoiler:including Elodie's father and the members of his party (though most certainly under the assumption that they were Aureans, possibly even thinking Bayford was the Aurean monarch). The closest she gets to comeuppance is losing one of her eyes to Elodie.]] It's even debatable if this is really comeuppance, as the dragon seems to have both eyes when she burns the royal family, implying that Elodie healing her undid all the damage she did in their fight.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: The Dragon is clearly intended to be seen as a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds with the sacrifices [[spoiler:being payment for the unprovoked murder of her children.]] children]] and Elodie taking pity on her when she discovers this, [[spoiler:healing her wounds and teaming up with her to defeat the Aurean royal family]]. The problem being is that she's also a sadistic SerialKiller who's been taking her rage out on fully innocent girls for ''centuries'' without a flicker of remorse and only minds that she [[spoiler:didn't kill the 'right' girls]]. She gleefully tortures and butchers utterly helpless people [[spoiler:including Elodie's father and the members of his party (though most certainly under the assumption that they were Aureans, possibly even thinking Bayford was the Aurean monarch). The closest she gets to comeuppance is losing one of her eyes to Elodie.]] It's Elodie and it's even debatable if this is really comeuppance, as the dragon seems to have both eyes when she burns the royal family, implying that Elodie healing her undid all the damage she did in their fight.fight]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on work content


* BrokenAesop: If you have been unjustly wronged, it doesn't make it ok to take out your anger on innocent people who had no involvement in causing your suffering, unless they are descended from the perpetrator [[SinsOfTheFather then that makes it ok]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: If The film tries to present a message along the lines of "If you have been unjustly wronged, it doesn't make it ok okay to take out your anger on innocent people who had no involvement in causing your suffering, unless they are descended from suffering". However, the perpetrator [[SinsOfTheFather then that makes message ends up being confusing or outright contradictory because of the emphasis on the Aureans tricking innocent young women into becoming dragon sacrifices to spare their own women; while the royal family's hands aren't clean for this and [[spoiler:and the dragon's children were unjustly murdered by the original king of Aurea, she's still in the wrong for demanding the deaths of the king's descendants given their only crime was [[SinsOfOurFathers being related]] to the person who wronged her]]. Consequently, the message ends up sounding more like "It's okay to kill innocent people as long as they're related to the original perpatrator". Some viewers have also pointed out this contradicts the film's feminist angle, given it ok]].unintentionally suggests it's okay for women to be punished for the wrongdoing of a man.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)


* BrokenAesop: If you have been unjustly wronged, it doesn't make it ok to take out your vengeance on innocent people who had no involvement in causing your suffering, unless they are descended from the perpetrator [[SinsOfTheFather then that makes it ok]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: If you have been unjustly wronged, it doesn't make it ok to take out your vengeance anger on innocent people who had no involvement in causing your suffering, unless they are descended from the perpetrator [[SinsOfTheFather then that makes it ok]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)


* BrokenAesop: If you have been unjustly wronged, it doesn't make it ok to take out your vengeance on innocent people who had no involvement in causing your suffering, unless they are descended from the perpetrator [[SinsOfThyFather then that makes it ok]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: If you have been unjustly wronged, it doesn't make it ok to take out your vengeance on innocent people who had no involvement in causing your suffering, unless they are descended from the perpetrator [[SinsOfThyFather [[SinsOfTheFather then that makes it ok]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenAesop: If you have been unjustly wronged, it doesn't make it ok to take out your vengeance on innocent people who had no involvement in causing your suffering, unless they are descended from the perpetrator [[SinsOfThyFather then that makes it ok]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


EsotericHappyEnding: Elodie has defeated the kingdom that is sacrificing women to a dragon. However, it seems her own kingdom, especially with their king [[spoiler:dead]], will still be suffering from an apocalyptically harsh winter and famine. Elodie's wedding and [[spoiler:sacrifice]] was a bargain struck to avert such disaster, only for the king to attempt to back out at the last minute. [[spoiler:Aurea is also in total chaos, with the extermination of its entire ruling royal family. Real world history teaches us that is not a recipe for stability.]]

to:

* EsotericHappyEnding: Elodie has defeated the kingdom that is sacrificing women to a dragon. However, it seems her own kingdom, especially with their king [[spoiler:dead]], will still be suffering from an apocalyptically harsh winter and famine. Elodie's wedding and [[spoiler:sacrifice]] was a bargain struck to avert such disaster, only for the king to attempt to back out at the last minute. [[spoiler:Aurea is also in total chaos, with the extermination of its entire ruling royal family. Real world history teaches us that is not a recipe for stability.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


EsotericHappyEnding: Elodie has defeated the kingdom that is sacrificing women to a dragon. However, it seems her own kingdom, especially with their king [[spoiler:dead]], will still be suffering from an apocalyptically harsh winter and famine. Elodie's wedding and [[spoiler:sacrifice]] was a bargain struck to avert such disaster, only for the king to attempt to back out at the last minute.

to:

EsotericHappyEnding: Elodie has defeated the kingdom that is sacrificing women to a dragon. However, it seems her own kingdom, especially with their king [[spoiler:dead]], will still be suffering from an apocalyptically harsh winter and famine. Elodie's wedding and [[spoiler:sacrifice]] was a bargain struck to avert such disaster, only for the king to attempt to back out at the last minute. [[spoiler:Aurea is also in total chaos, with the extermination of its entire ruling royal family. Real world history teaches us that is not a recipe for stability.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

EsotericHappyEnding: Elodie has defeated the kingdom that is sacrificing women to a dragon. However, it seems her own kingdom, especially with their king [[spoiler:dead]], will still be suffering from an apocalyptically harsh winter and famine. Elodie's wedding and [[spoiler:sacrifice]] was a bargain struck to avert such disaster, only for the king to attempt to back out at the last minute.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CaptainObviousReveal: Many viewers guessed the plot twist that the dragon had been demanding the sacrifice of three princesses every generation [[spoiler:out of revenge over her own three children being unjustly killed, and that it was the Aureans who were the original aggressors]]. Viewers pointed out that the dragon always demanding ''three princesses'' was oddly specific; some of the intended foreshadowing around the midway point is also pretty unsubtle, including [[spoiler:Elodie's dream where a previous sacrifice states that Aurea's story about the dragon is "a lie" and the dragon bluntly stating that "Three were taken. Three must be given"]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: The Dragon is clearly intended to be seen as a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds with the sacrifices [[spoiler:being payment for the unprovoked murder of her children.]] The problem being she's a sadistic SerialKiller who's been taking her rage out on fully innocent girls for ''centuries'' without a flicker of remorse and only minds that she [[spoiler:didn't kill the 'right' girls]]. She gleefully tortures and butchers utterly helpless people [[spoiler:including Elodie's father and the members of his party (though most certainly under the assumption that they were Aureans, possibly even thinking Bayford was the Aurean monarch). The closest she gets to comeuppance is losing one of her eyes to Elodie.]]

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: The Dragon is clearly intended to be seen as a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds with the sacrifices [[spoiler:being payment for the unprovoked murder of her children.]] The problem being she's a sadistic SerialKiller who's been taking her rage out on fully innocent girls for ''centuries'' without a flicker of remorse and only minds that she [[spoiler:didn't kill the 'right' girls]]. She gleefully tortures and butchers utterly helpless people [[spoiler:including Elodie's father and the members of his party (though most certainly under the assumption that they were Aureans, possibly even thinking Bayford was the Aurean monarch). The closest she gets to comeuppance is losing one of her eyes to Elodie.]] It's even debatable if this is really comeuppance, as the dragon seems to have both eyes when she burns the royal family, implying that Elodie healing her undid all the damage she did in their fight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SoOkayItsAverage: A common consensus is that the film has some nice-looking sets, costumes and special effects, and the first half is an enjoyable and suspenseful dark fantasy[=/=] survival horror with a seemingly perfect fairytale kingdom hiding a dark secret and Elodie trying to escape from the dragon's lair. However, the larger plot received criticism for being underdeveloped or nonsensical in places (particularly by the movie's second half), certain plot twists resulting in muddled messages and some characters lacking depth and/or screentime. Overall, it's thought the film's writing wasn't polished or clever enough to truly make the most of its premise, but if you don't think about the story details too much it makes for a decent fantasy flick.

to:

* SoOkayItsAverage: A common consensus is that the film has some nice-looking sets, costumes and special effects, and the first half is an enjoyable and suspenseful dark fantasy[=/=] survival fantasy[=/=]survival horror with a seemingly perfect fairytale kingdom hiding a dark secret and Elodie trying to escape from the dragon's lair. However, the larger plot received criticism for being underdeveloped or nonsensical in places (particularly by the movie's second half), certain plot twists resulting in muddled messages and some characters lacking depth and/or screentime. Overall, it's thought the film's writing wasn't polished or clever enough to truly make the most of its premise, but if you don't think about the story details too much it makes for a decent fantasy flick.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SoOkayItsAverage: A common consensus is that the film has some nice-looking sets, costumes and special effects, and the first half is an enjoyable and suspenseful dark fantasy[=/=] survival horror with a seemingly perfect fairytale kingdom hiding a dark secret and Elodie trying to escape from the dragon's lair. However, the larger plot received criticism for being underdeveloped or nonsensical in places (particularly by the movie's second half), certain plot twists resulting in muddled messages and some characters lacking depth and/or screentime. Overall, it's thought the film's writing wasn't polished or clever enough to truly make the most of its premise, but if you don't think about the story details too much it makes for a decent fantasy flick.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* AccidentalAesop: [[spoiler:The dragon eventually comes to feel remorse for killing the princesses -- but only after Elodie reveals that most of them were unrelated to the Aurean royal bloodline, implying that the dragon would have been completely justified in murdering young women for centuries if they had actually been descendants of the man who ordered the killing of her babies]]. This essentially changes the story's moral from "killing innocent people is wrong" to "killing innocent people is wrong, as long as they're not distantly related to the source of your pain is fine. Killing the distant decendances of the people who caused you pain is wholly justified, though."
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: The reason why Elodie in the last act kept trying to reason with the dragon: was it because she sympathized with her or was it out of pragmatism? Elodie already reasoned that escaping from the dragon was useless and even if she did the Aurean royal family could easily throw her and her sister back into the cave to pacify it, so by revealing the truth, Elodie could gain a powerful ally to point out their mutual enemy: the Aurean royal family, as well as keeping further innocent woman from being sacrificed, The fact she had the clear opportunity to slay the dragon, which would have not only dealt with a real threat but may have made the royal family grateful to her, her choosing to instead spare/heal the dragon seems to confirm the sympathy interpretation.

to:

* AccidentalAesop: [[spoiler:The dragon eventually comes to feel remorse for killing the princesses -- but only after Elodie reveals that most of them were unrelated to the Aurean royal bloodline, implying that the dragon would have been completely justified in murdering young women for centuries if they had actually been descendants of the man who ordered the killing of her babies]]. This essentially changes the story's moral from "killing innocent people is wrong" to "killing innocent people is wrong, as long as they're not distantly related to the source of your pain is fine. Killing the distant decendances descendants of the people who caused you pain is wholly justified, though."
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: The reason why Elodie in the last act kept Elodie's motives for trying to reason with the dragon: dragon [[spoiler:and ultimately saving her]] in the final act: was it because she sympathized with her or was it out of pragmatism? Elodie already reasoned that escaping from the dragon was useless and even if she did the Aurean royal family could easily throw her and her sister back into the cave to pacify it, so by revealing the truth, truth behind [[spoiler:the royal family's deception]], Elodie could gain a powerful ally to point out against their mutual enemy: the Aurean royal family, as well as keeping further innocent woman from being sacrificed, The sacrificed. Alternatively, the fact she had the clear opportunity to slay the dragon, which would have not only dealt with a real threat but may have made the royal family grateful to her, her choosing to instead spare/heal [[spoiler:spare/heal the dragon dragon]] seems to confirm the sympathy interpretation.



* TearJerker: Elodie discovering the names of all the women who died before her etched into the cave wall.

to:

* TearJerker: Elodie discovering the names of all the women who died before her etched into the cave wall. To really make it hit home, there's a montage of several of these women throughout the years, some of whom barely look like adults, huddled in the cave; some are [[TearsOfFear sobbing]] and praying, some are trying to tend to their wounds or start a fire, and some just look plain exhausted and [[ThousandYardStare out-of-it]]. All of the women who made it to that cave had the same realisation that they were far from the first to end in up here, and others will inevitably follow after they die.



* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: The Dragon is clearly intended to be seen as a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds with the sacrifices [[spoiler:being payment for the unprovoked murder of her children.]] The problem being she's a sadistic SerialKiller who's been taking her rage out on fully innocent girls for ''centuries'' without a flicker of remorse and only minds that she [[spoiler:didn't kill the 'right' girls. She gleefully tortures and butchers utterly helpless people including Elodie's father and the members of his party (though most certainly under the assumption that they were Aureans, possibly even thinking Bayford was the Aurean monarch). The closest she gets to comeuppance is losing one of her eyes to Elodie.]]

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: The Dragon is clearly intended to be seen as a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds with the sacrifices [[spoiler:being payment for the unprovoked murder of her children.]] The problem being she's a sadistic SerialKiller who's been taking her rage out on fully innocent girls for ''centuries'' without a flicker of remorse and only minds that she [[spoiler:didn't kill the 'right' girls. girls]]. She gleefully tortures and butchers utterly helpless people including [[spoiler:including Elodie's father and the members of his party (though most certainly under the assumption that they were Aureans, possibly even thinking Bayford was the Aurean monarch). The closest she gets to comeuppance is losing one of her eyes to Elodie.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on work content


* AccidentalAesop: [[spoiler:The dragon eventually comes to feel remorse for killing the princesses -- but only after Elodie reveals that most of them were unrelated to the Aurean royal bloodline, implying that the dragon would have been completely justified in murdering young women for centuries if they had actually been descendants of the man who ordered the killing of her babies]]. This essentially changes the story's moral from "killing innocent people is wrong" to "killing innocent people wholly unconnected to the source of your pain is fine if they're distantly related to the perpetrators."

to:

* AccidentalAesop: [[spoiler:The dragon eventually comes to feel remorse for killing the princesses -- but only after Elodie reveals that most of them were unrelated to the Aurean royal bloodline, implying that the dragon would have been completely justified in murdering young women for centuries if they had actually been descendants of the man who ordered the killing of her babies]]. This essentially changes the story's moral from "killing innocent people is wrong" to "killing innocent people wholly unconnected is wrong, as long as they're not distantly related to the source of your pain is fine if they're distantly related to fine. Killing the perpetrators.distant decendances of the people who caused you pain is wholly justified, though."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NightmareFuel: The scenes where Elodie is crawling through tight underground passages she can only ''just'' fit through are pretty uncomfortable and nail-biting, especially for viewers with claustrophobia. There's an especially horrific moment where Elodie slips headfirst down a narrow vertical passage and gets ''stuck upside down'', with her panic and helplessness being downright palpable. It also brings to mind the nightmarish real life Nutty Putty Cave tragedy.

Top