Suggestion: Sickeningly Sweethearts

From Webcomic Name, the "Couples" three-panel:

It shows a couple being extremely lovey-dovey, and a bystander being exasperated at the sight. The present page image only shows the former.

oh no

Is this the entire comic? We aren't allowed to use full comics pages without getting artist permission.

Edited by StarSword on Apr 30th 2024 at 12:37:49 PM

It is the whole comic. Is that why the page image for Overused Running Gag was cut from three panels to two?

It was restored after we got permission to use it. The thread archive says that it was always just two panels.

Edited by StarSword on Apr 30th 2024 at 12:46:32 PM

Maybe just the last panel would work?

I've sent them an email asking for approval to use the image.

That works, too, but I want to see if Norris will give permission to use all three panels.

Edited by Lapsem on Apr 30th 2024 at 9:52:30 AM

I mean, there's no need to use all 3 panels if one is sufficient to illustrate the trope. Conciseness.

6 works. Adding more panels dilutes the effect.

Edited by CompletelyNormalGuy on Apr 30th 2024 at 11:13:14 AM

Some takes on Sokka vs Katara/Aang

I don't know I feel Avatar is overdosed with images.

Still prefer 1 or 6

10.2

I like #6.

6 works

Aang and Katara aren't even sickeningly sweet, at least not to the same level. They're just kissing and being in love.

Edited by WarJay77 on Apr 30th 2024 at 2:54:47 PM

6

6

to 6

6.

6

for 6

Seems like people sure like #6. How's this for a caption, then, or something like it?

Source

6

6 works fine.